Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Japan Gov. Requests The Internet To Delete False Disaster Rumors

Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications(MIC) announced [J] that they had requested four Internet related organizations to delete “false rumors” on online bulletin boards “to keep safety and peace of mind in disastrous area”.

The four organizations are, Telecommunications Carriers Association(TCA), Telecom Services Association(TELESA) [J], Japan Internet Providers Association(JAIPA) and Japan Cable and Telecommunications Association(JCTA).

On the request [J, pdf], MIC stated, “false rumors around the Eastern Japan earthquake and the nuclear plant accident are circulated over word-of-mouth, e-mail and online bulletin boards”, and asked web site owners “to take voluntary action such like erasing information violating the laws and against public order and morals.” Interesting thing is that the request says “please take prompt countermeasures with due considerations to freedom of expression“. So they are at least aware what they are requesting.

There are, of course, immediate reactions on web. Some said that government is taking advantage of the disaster to gain control over the internet. But there are also opinions that Japanese government is so confused and too naive, unskilled on the Internet to expect that this kind of order will have any meanings. I feel that might be true, though it cannot be excused.


Link to full article

Zheye Open Source project from China helps you build your own quora clone website

zheye-quora-clone

Besides consumer electronics industry, cloning activities are also very active in Internet field in China. Almost every creative website got cloned in China. Recently a frequently discussed topic in China’s Internet industry is a new website Zhihu.com, which is a clone of Quora. Zhihu is still in its beta version, and not open to the public, and content could be only seem by logined users. Only invited people can register.

Now it’s funny that Chinese developer Huacnlee started a project called Zheye. Zhuhu Zheye together is a phrase from ancient Chinese. Huacnlee has launched a demo site called zheye.org, from which we could see the project looks just exactly the same as Quora, from the design to features, at least at the front end. The most important thing is that Zheye is an open source project hosted on GitHub, so everybody can download the code to build their own quora alike website. The problem is that it’s developed with framework Ruby On Rails, webmasters with no professional programming skills might find it far more difficult to make it run than other PHP scripts.

[Source:zheye.org,Github]

  • No Related Post

Link to full article

Japanese Government Opens Social Media(=Twitter) Guide Site For Public Organizations

Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry(METI) opened “Public Organization Social Media Portal” [J] to educate national governmental sections and local governments on how to utilize social media.

The portal shows several guidelines for 1. citizens to see social media and 2. government workers to send information via social media.

Interesting thing is, on this site “social media”/”private sector’s social media” all point Twitter only.

For people, the portal alerts that you should check if the governmental Twitter account is real, and provides some check points,

For national and local governmental sections, they hinted that the organization should have a link from their official website to the Twitter account, to convince people that the account is not fake. It also suggests that you should have a profile, giving account policy documentation and apply for Twinavi listing, which “is a possible path” to be a Twitter authenticated account, though it is also warned that listed on Twinavi does not guarantee to make it an authenticated account.

After the quake, some public/semi-public organizations have been opening Twitter accounts, including Prime Minister’s Office (English one), Tokyo Electric Power Co.(TEPCO) and Japan Ground Self-Defense Force (=army, though they are not allowed to identity themselves so).


Link to full article

From Local Deals To Selling Products – Group Buying Pivoting Already?

In my last coverage about group buying sites I mentioned the players that have not entered the electronics and products space as “not given up yet”. To make it a little more polite I should have said “not Pivoted yet”. 1 year on and the pivoting for all the group buying sites that mushroomed in the recent past seems to be finally in visible distance.

With the step towards selling electronics and other lifestyle consumer products, the group buying players will now find their sweet spot. Already all the big and known players are pressing hard on the products pedal and soon will see the difference between selling 300 odd coupons of a local restaurant to selling 2000 odd Reebok sunglasses in the same time, with the same marketing efforts. Even more when they realise that the cost of educating and acquiring a deal from a local restaurant is much higher than getting an already active ebay seller to now offer products through their site. The cost of maintaining an army of sales guys will soon start biting them and probably investor pressure might result in shutting down of the local deals section. Also when they see 80% of the revenue coming from 20% of sourcing cost, they might as well give up pivot. But now the fight will be against more established guys like Flipkart or Infibeam, which again means lots of learning, stronger customer support and probably rebranding to come out of the nuisance of being a local deals player.

The other area that these players are looking at is coupons of newly launched ecommerce portals. If you look at it closely, group buying sites are mere mailing list with the only targeting being the city of the user. With their dynamic nature they cannot have predictability and also they cannot have SEO juice, which the established players like Khojguru (that pivoted from a local search player to coupon listing site) or cult listing sites like RetailMeNot has to offer. Though in such a case they will certainly provoke a lot of impulsive buy from little known or new ecommerce portals. In few weeks the fight for differentiation will boil down to having exclusive coupons, which again is an open game.

Coupons and promotions for local business is definitely a big business for web but the Groupon model in its current form is just not right for Indian markets. The problem with all the Groupon clones in India was that they were a blatant copy of the US model (even the FAQ section was a verbatim copy) without understanding the diversity of the Indian market or acknowledging the unorganized structure of the brick and mortar businesses. And also due to lack of friction to enter the space almost everybody jumped on the bandwagon within no time.

My fear with the current pivoting is also similar, most players moving from emailing printable electronic coupons to delivering physical goods are not digging deep into the logistics bit. Most of them are not looking to carry the pain of handling logistics or dealing with bad products. They are entering the space with mindset of just sell the product and then their work is done but that is when their real work will start. That is when the consumer will decide to write a complain on Mouthshut or a praise on twitter. And then again there will be hue and cry about e-commerce not working in India.

May be by then they will have dried down all the cash that there is in the kitty and may be then there will be no chance for pivoting. So if you are one of them, make sure you answer all the questions before you enter the space. You are not a Myntra who can sell a product at premium and afford to replace it. Your sole proposition is about selling it cheaper and any extra cost may be detrimental of your wafer thin margins going below the neutral axis.

There is nothing wrong in pivoting, it does not mean giving up, it only means giving a second try with a more experienced and learned mind. Do not worry about all the “how?” yet, things will fall in place. But if you do not have all the “why” answered, give yourself some time and enter with a determined and stronger belief in what you are willing to attempt.

What do you think of this pivoting? Will it happen? Is it worth?

What will the real Groupon do in India if these guys have already tested the model?


Link to full article

Book Review : The Crowdfunding Revolution [Social Networking meets Venture Financing]

As a follow up to my earlier post on crowdfunding [a concept wherein the ‘crowd’ – that is, people like you and me – can participate in the early stage funding process] , I got an opportunity to read this book by Kevin Lawton and Dan Marom – in which the authors reason out as to why crowdfunding is a natural progression to the current status of venture financing – given the increasing impact of social networks in our lives that has simplified sharing of views and knowledge – thus deploying the ‘wisdom of the crowds’ to the otherwise ‘private’ world of venture capital.crowdfunding
Citing numerous examples [right from how funds were raised for building the Statue of Liberty (!) to Open Source Development, Wikipedia, etc] , the authors emphasize on how the advent of information technology has raised the possibilities of collaborative projects. That’s one reason why it is only now that this concept makes more implementation sense – than say, a decade ago when collaboration was not that easy.

The book also takes plenty of digs at the ‘traditional’ venture capital model. It questions the very basic understanding that early stage investments should only be in ‘informed’ hands – saying that IPOs have not just been an important form of VC liquidity, but also a ‘dumping ground for low value startups’ – citing the dismal 1-in-20 post IPO odds of shareholder value creation. It suggests that the ‘traditional’ VC business model is outdated – and it is highly unlikely for a few people in the VC industry to keep pace with the ever increasing rate of change in technologies and businesses. It also suggests that VC funded startups might try too hard to achieve pre set ‘milestones’ – for the fear of further equity dilution – as against constantly tweaking direction (‘pivoting’) to match with that of the changing world.

The book also illustrates how crowdfunding of projects is ‘not just about money’, but – as it gives an example of crowdfunded movies – could also be in the form of other ‘perks’ like mention in the credits, discounts, appearances in the movies etc.

However, coming back to the ‘money’ part of it, the book underscores the irony with regards to startup valuations – wherein one is skeptical in letting the ‘market’ (implying the ‘crowd’) to decide the valuations and rather one lets ‘few parties with special interests’ decide the prices.

The book then turns the reader’s attention towards how a futuristic crowdfunding platform would look like. This, I thought was the most fascinating part – since the authors have not stopped at just pointing the deficiencies in the current system but have also offered a very well thought out solution – which touches upon almost all possible concerns. Some ideas like having a standardized XML like language for reporting startup information for algorithmic scanning are quite cool. This part of the book makes for some really interesting reading – as one encounters one futuristic concept after other (and also a sound reasoning as to why it makes sense).

Kevin Lawton himself has initiated an effort towards creating global best practices for crowdfunding platforms by way of this informal LinkedIn group (now that’s ‘crowdsourcing’ at work!). These best practices include focus on disclosures, informing investors about the importance of diversification, letting them know of the typical risk return profiles in early stage investments, etc.

All in all, this book is a comprehensive introduction to the concept of crowdfunding . The examples (which span across the past, present and the future!) spice it up well. A must read for anyone interested in the early stage funding process.

[Book review done by Guest author, Mandar Kulkarni. If you want to write book reviews on Pluggd.in, do connect with us.]

» More Book Reviews


Link to full article

Twitter Research–50% Of Consumed Tweets Are Generated by 20K Elites

Twitter was supposed to be a democratic tool, but here is the reality – bloggers follow bloggers, celebrity follow celebrities and media follows media.

A research conducted by Yahoo reveals interesting data points:

“Roughly 50% of tweets consumed are generated by just 20K elite users—where the media produces the most information, but celebrities are the most followed.”

The study classifies users using Twitter Lists into “elite” and “ordinary” users (snowball sampling), further classifying elite users into one of four categories of interest— media, celebrities, organizations, and bloggers. Some findings from the research:

  • There is considerable support for the two-step flow of information—almost half the information that originates from the media passes to the masses indirectly via a diffuse intermediate layer of opinion leaders, who although classified as ordinary users, are more connected and more exposed to the media than their followers
  • Attention remains highly concentrated, where roughly 0.05% of the population accounts for almost half of all posted URLs.
  • Media-originated URLs are disproportionately represented among short-lived URLs while those originated by bloggers tend to be overrepresented among long-lived URLs. Finally, we find that the longest-lived URLs are dominated by content such as videos and music, which are continually being rediscovered by Twitter users and appear to persist indefinitely.

Some other interesting facets of the research:

WHO LISTENS TO WHOM:

  • This is an important question considering that Twitter has become an important listening channel and also a marketing channel for organizations.
  • High values along the diagonal cells shows that tweets from a particular category are consumed the most within the same category.

clip_image002

WHO LISTENS TO WHAT:

- World News and even within that US news accounts for the maximum information which is listened to.

Do you agree with the findings of the above report and more importantly do you see a similar pattern in your comprehension of information while on Twitter.

Interesting to note that even after so much of penetration Twitter has achieved, elite class still rules the mass – keep this “consumer behavior” (of following the elite) in mind, while building your consumer product.

You may read the complete report here.

[By guest author Pooja Gupta.]


Link to full article

The PowerPlug Contest For April is ON

PowerPlug is redefining the way the (so called) ecosystem knows about the real technology startups from India. We had a great list of startups that applied for the month of March and the winner, VisualWebsiteOptimizer surely defines the PowerPlug concept (well, the founder gets an iPad).

Do You Have It In You?

Do You Have It In You?

The contest is now open for the month of April and here are quick FAQs:

Who is this for?

Typically, product startups and to be precise, startups of age >6 months. If not revenue making, you should have pivoted the product and found a sweet spot in the market (atleast you think so!). You can apply only once in a quarter.

Why the minimal restriction of 6 months?

Well, 6 months is what it will ideally take you to pivot/find a sweet spot for your business/product plan [aside, real entrepreneurs do gatecrash].

Is there a theme to this month’s contest
No. All startups can apply.

Selection Criteria?

  • Potential of Business Idea
  • Articulation of the Business Plan and Understanding of the Competition
  • Execution Strategy
  • Team and company building

Do I need to submit a Business Plan?

No. Just fill up the form (also embedded in this post).

- More FAQs here.

How Do I Keep Myself Updated With the Contest?

» Follow ThePowerPlug Contest on Facebook or Twitter.


Apply To Be A PowerPlug [April 2011]

The application form for PowerPlug Contest. Last date to apply is April 20th.
  • Your Name*
  • Company Website*
  • Email*
    Your Email Address. Ensure that you check this email id frequently.
  • Company Founding Date*
  • Product Name*
  • Industry Category
  • Revenues Status?*
    • Pre Revenue?
    • Post Revenue
  • Product Description*
    Tell us why do you think this is a great product.
  • What (and Whose) Problem Are you Solving?*
    Be precise about the problem statement you are solving Do mention the target segment as well as your business USP.
  • Core Technology
    Share what's the core technology used by the company (LAMP/MS Stack?)
  • Working Prototype/Video/Demo Link
    Share link to working prorotype or demo of your product.
  • The Team*
    Please share details of the founding team/key team members.


Link to full article

Group Buying Site Koovs Moves To Products [CEO On RoI and Manpower]

Amongst the few group buying players which have been able to make a mark, Koovs.com is now offering to sell a range electronics and apparels though there newly launched discount store. The approach is same as the local deals category, to offer “heavy discounts” on consumer electronics and other lifestyle products.

The move is not new for the group buying space as every one has been testing the products space with one off deals and last week SnapDeal announced getting into the products space with a focussed approach.

Here is a candid mail from Manish Tiwari, CEO of Koovs.

The Indian group buying arena is undergoing a visible yet slow transformation from offering discounts for service categories like beauty, health, and dining to the inclusion of products from popular categories like computer peripherals, electronics and apparels. The race to become a one stop shop for all services and products is on.

Call it umbrella strategy or what you may, this sudden shift in strategy was expected to dawn upon the players as the Indian e-commerce stage was still not ripe enough for a full throttle Groupon replica to be based on services alone and make enough moolah to appear under the shopping radar of Google or Groupon itself. And why not, some may ask, as Groupon itself, has offered certain product based deals every now and then.

If we go by the recent trend, one will see that the top three Indian group buying websites have started offering lifestyle and necessity but predominantly electronic products. We knew when we set out for growth that our goals will not be satisfied by offering services based deals alone, as it is restricted to tier one city only. More so, featuring services based deals is manpower intensive and the ROI doesn’t justify the effort.

So what do you think of the move? Will they be able to compete against the biggies? Does the e-commerce space of selling electronic products have bigger challenges to deal with?


Link to full article

Groupon Enters Indonesia With Acquisition Of East Ventures’ Disdus

Back in Dec 2010, daily deal giant Groupon entered Asia with acquisitions of assets in Singapore, Philippines, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Today, they have expanded again with its acquisition of Indonesian site, Disdus.

Launched in August 2010, Disdus currently serves Greater Jakarta and Bandung, with plans to expand to other major cities in Indonesia by the end of 2011.

Disdus joins the Groupon family, with more than 6K employees worldwide and millions of customers in 46 countries.

Disqus is a portfolio company of Singapore and Indonesia-based venture fund, East Ventures.


Link to full article