Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Hands on with the iPad 2: Yes its here! [Review]

This year is supposed to be the year of the tablet with predictions that tablet sales will outpace PC sales, and Apple is leading the charge in an endeavor to knock all other  tablets out of the boxing ring even before they get to step into the ring and take a deep breath.

Last year saw Apple become the undisputed champion of the tablet form factor with its iPad. An impressive device, albeit a few shortcoming. Apple’s tablet offering this year seems to have learnt a great deal from its predecessor and packs quite a punch. With one hell of a look and  power packed hardware, the competition sure will have a hard time standing its ground against this one. Here’s a look at the specs under the shiny glass sheet, a beast in a prince’s clothing.

iPad2

iPad2

iPad2 Review

iPad2 Review

  • 1GHz dual-core A5 CPU
  • 512MB RAM
  • 16GB, 32GB, 64GB storage options
  • Front & Rear Cameras, front is VGA, rear is 720p
  • 9.7? LED display with 1024×768 screen resolution at 132ppi
  • GPU said to be 9x faster
  • Video output supports up to 1080p
  • Runs iOS 4.3
  • 10 hour battery life
  • White & Black color options

Prices : starting from Approx 29,000 for 16GB WiFi only upto 47,000 for 64GB WiFi + 3G.

Review: iPad2

Well I’m no Apple fanboy, and I personally don’t care for the absolutely controlled philosophy of Apple, but I think I know a great device when I see one. Apple’s iPad2 is just that! A great device. As the Apple tag line says, the new iPad2 is thinner, lighter and faster than the original. And if you hold both, the iPad and the iPad2 in your hands you will notice the difference immediately.

The touch screen on the iPad2 is awesome quality, the kind that you must be accustomed to if you are an Apple iDevice user. It churns out video with awesome clarity and sound. The rear camera on the iPad was impressive not so much for the front facing VGA, although I hoped for higher volume on music playback I was pretty satisfied as it is supposed to be a single user device.

What makes this iPad2 an absolute joy are the apps. With a killer collection to choose from, the iPad Appstore is what delivers a knockout punch to all its competitors. The games, although I didn’t play any heavy 3D games on it, surely impress and engage the user in hours of gameplay without even knowing it. The virtual keyboard on the iPad2 is well spaced out and makes for comfortable typing.

The iPad2 is an awesome improvement over the first generation, with better speed and performance.

Given all the hoopla sorrouding the device, iPad2 is surely the best tablet available out there, there may be a few notable competitors, but none of them come close to delivering an experience that the iPad2 does.

The closest device that comes to the iPad experience, i.e. Galaxy Tab seems to have a long way to go (and we put the onus on Google’s Android to match iOS capabilities).

Accessories/Features not yet tested

  • Smart cover that I was so looking forward to.
  • Facetime app.


Link to full article

Olive Mobile Launches Fluid V-W1 Android Phone for Rs. 10,000

Olive mobile announced a high end android phone running android 2.3 gingerbread in February earlier this year, but the phone is yet to be seen. Meanwhile Olive has decide to not withhold its next release and gone ahead with its entry into the booming low end android market in India. Its latest offering is Olive Fluid V-W1.

Officially the phone priced at an approx. price of Rs10,000 has hit webstores at a price that seems better than what the company initially thought. The phone will now be available at Rs8,000 approximately, which makes it a good buy at the price it has been offered. The specs are average at most and it will surely encounter tough competition from other phones that are priced similarly. A quick look at the specs sheet and comparison with other entry level androids should give you a better perspective on whether you should buy this phone or not.

clip_image002

  • STE6715, 468MHz Processor
  • 256MB RAM ( for OS as well as storage) expandable with micro sd upto 32GB supported
  • 3.5” TFT multi-touch capacitve touch screen
  • 3MP rear camera.
  • Comes with Android 2.1 (Eclair) may be upgradable to 2.2 ( Froyo ) uncomfirmed.
  • Wifi, GPS, Accelerometer( G sensor), Bluetooth,
  • GPRS, EDGE, 3G.
  • 1300mAH battery ( upto 240 mins )

Comparing this to other phones in the same price range reveals some interesting things, like low internal memory and older OS without any confirmation of an upgrade. Most phones in the similar price range offer Android Froyo. Specs can only tell you so much, so be sure to try before you buy.


Link to full article

Innovation Works or Shanzhai Works

A few days ago, I was talking to some friends about entrepreneurs in China.  They asked me to summarize what I think, and there is nothing more apparent to me than the word “Shanzhai”.

Shanzhai means cloning.  But it is more than just a direct copying, but usually it also includes considerable localisation.  All of the biggest internet names in China started as clones of successful Western models, e.g. Baidu started as a clone of Google, Tencent tried to be ICQ in China, Taobao modeled after eBay, Renren is a facebook in China and Sina Weibo imitated Twitter.

Then, they tried their best to localize the services, making them popular among the local Chinese.  In the process, sometimes, they have out- performed the services they tried to  imitate in the beginning.  For example, Tencent’s QQ has over 600 million active users and the company earned over US$1.2 trillion in profit last year.  ICQ is no longer a major player in the internet world.  Most industry insiders also believe Sina Weibo offer its users more functionality than Twitter.

And if we look at Innovation Works, the incubation center founded by former Google China head, Lee Kaifu, the trend is even more apparent.  Many of Innovation Works’ project are clones of successful internet companies.  In the list of portfolio companies (http://www.chuangxin.com/portfolio/), Dianxin is an Android clone, Wandoujia trys to imitate 91 Assistant, a popular mobile phone management software made by NetDragon and Umeng is modelled after U.S. startup Flurry.

Probably, readers who knows Innovation Works better can suggest even more examples.  Just a thought, maybe Prof. Lee Kaifu can change the name of  Innovation Works to  Shanzhai Works, so as to better reflect what it is actually doing.

 

Related posts:

  1. Rumor v2: Kaifu Lee Is To Launch Innovation-Works
  2. Lei Jun Vs. Kaifu Lee, Angel Investor Vs. Innovation Works
  3. Chinese Gov't Says Shanzhai is Also Innovation – What ?!


Link to full article

Buy And Sell Offline Media With EatAds.com

Citing a Nielsen 2009 report, new Singapore-based company, EatAds.com writes that the Singapore outdoor advertising industry is worth roughly SGD $134 million a year. The company aims to help companies buy and sell offline media. Founded by John Fearon and Brian Frissyn, EatAds is an online platform and marketplace that “facilitates the exchange of out-of-home advertising space between outdoor media owners and media buyers such as private and public companies and advertising agencies”.

EatAds offers many different types of outdoor advertising including traditional billboards and even posters on lampposts.

Listing and bidding for a space is free, but EatAds takes a 15% commission for every successful space sold.

To help companies and brands with the design of the creative, EatAds “plans to provide a supplier interface that will give you a range of graphics designers that you can work with”.

Thanks to Jeff Paine for the tip!


Link to full article

Startups: Good Looks Are More Than Just Eye Candy [Is Usability Overhyped?]

[Today, we are starting a series called “Bring Your Own Insights”, where we bring selected guests to share their insights with Pluggd.in audience on a regular basis. We have always believed that our readers are amazingly insightful, so why not enable a channel for them to share their insights/experience with the audience?

These guests will come from different industries and will share their insights on a very frequent basis. The first article that goes live as part of this series is written by Sanket Nadhani, who heads Marketing & Sales at FusionCharts.]


Startups: Good Looks Are More Than Just Eye Candy [Is Usability Overhyped?]

I like talking to our customers whenever I get a chance, over phone or at the expos we exhibit at. I try to understand how they are using FusionCharts and how they see their charting requirements evolving. And at the end of these conversations I typically end up asking – So what made you choose FusionCharts? Nine times out of ten, pat comes the answer – It looks great!

What? You sell because you look good? Not because you help save time, cost, have more features or any of those things, I hear you ask. Well….yes we get you started in fifteen minutes….have a no-nonsense licensing….are pretty comprehensive…but the main reason users purchase our charts is because they look good. So much so that we recently changed our tagline to just convey this one message – Stunning charts for Web & Enterprise. And today, I would like to talk to you about how good looks are not just about the eye candy. Not just about the five-second gratification of the eyes. It is a lot more than that.

I will talk about products in general here and not restrict it to the charting niche, to make it easier for you to relate to.

Builds perception

The first appearance of a person forms the perception we have of him. They way a person dresses, his posture, his greeting style and handshake go a long way in determining what we think of him. Similarly, looks alter the consumer’s perception of your product in a long way.

People believe that what looks good is good. The perception of better looking things working better pre-use is commonly accepted. Post-use, not so much. In his book Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things, Don Norman cites the examples of researchers in Japan who has set up two ATMs that were exactly identical in function and how they worked. The only difference was the buttons and screens were more attractive in one of the ATMs. People faced fewer difficulties with the attractive machine, which means it actually worked better. What looks good is good, post-use.

This perception is pretty simple to explain. When we are using a beautiful product, our brain is relaxed and more likely to find solutions to problems. However, when we are tense, our brain gets a sort of tunnel vision where we only see the problem in front of us. Put simply, what looks good is good.

Builds credibility

To put together a good-looking design, it takes a lot of time and attention. People feel that since so much attention has been paid to the design, the same amount of attention would have been given to the core functioning of the product as well, which implies that it is a good credible product.

In a study done on website credibility by Persuasive Technology Lab, Stanford University, half of the consumers (46.1% to be exact) out of the 2,684 people who took part attributed the credibility of the website to how it looked. This made design way more than important than other well-accepted factors like name recognition (branding), information clarity, accuracy and affiliations. What was most surprising that the credibility-related comments about visual design occurred with the most frequency for finance sites, a domain of websites where information and its surrounding functions are supposed to be the king. Case in point, mint.com, a personal finance web app. Mint.com, pretty much unknown three years back, used good design to build credibility strong enough to convince people give their credit card numbers to a company with a dot.com in its name, not to forget all of their online banking passwords.

As people use the web increasingly each day, for finding health information, storing financial data, making travel bookings, they need to instantly determine whether a website is credible or not. They need to know whether they can trust the website or not? This is where design is the big differentiator. Easy and quick.

Increases Engagement

The web is getting wider day by day, and the marketplace more crowded. The time to shape the experience of the customer with your product is very short. Time spent on the website is the new hits received. In a situation like this, good looks can be the big differentiator between you and your competitor.

A better looking design will focus the user’s attention on your product and he will spend more time with it. He will get to know more about what your product can do for him, try those things out and ultimately see that it “works better,” is “more usable” and definitely “more comprehensive.” Who really wants to use boring products full of gray that reminds them that they are sitting in cubicles and talking to machines? Not only that, a good design also leads to an excited user. It gives him something memorable to go out tell his friends about. What else can you ask for?

Builds an Emotional Connection

Humans are social animals, all of us learnt at school. They are relationship-seeking creatures. They tend to form an emotional connection with everyone and everything they come across over and over again. All the product purchase decisions aren’t as rational as they are usually made out to be. They aren’t entirely made on sensible things like technical capabilities or product pricing. Emotional bonds like a good rapport with the people behind the product, a long-term association with the product or the product being “just perfect” are also major decision-influencers. As is good design.

A good design triggers a stream of positive emotions from the brain. An emotional connection makes a person stick to a product, never mind the extra bucks he has to spend for the product. It fuels his creativity. Increases his productivity. It is the only way he can work. All other options fail for him. That is how strong emotional connections can be.

And if you are still not convinced, here’s the magic word.

Apple.

Motivates and Sets Expectations

Till now, I have been discussing how good looks affect the experience the outside world has with your product. In this final point I am about to make, I will bring out how a good-looking design motivates your internal team and inspires them to create a better product on the whole.

In this excellent blog post by Chris Campbell of Wufoo (a company I highly admire) on the importance of design in business, he mentions how good design creates a sort of a ripple effect, sets higher expectations and inspires the overall development to create a better product on the whole.

“Good design in our company doesn’t just sell products. Good design fosters collaboration, communicates strategy, sets expectations, improves the efficiency of a team, and most importantly inspires and motivates like nothing else.

When you start out with a beautiful and awe inspiring wireframe or prototype, your expectations about that product and everything associated with it is expected to also be beautiful and awe inspiring. If the initial expectations for a web application are low by bad or no design, then bad practices seem to find their way into the code, the web site marketing, and even the attitudes toward customers by employees. When you start with great design as a foundation, there is a snowball effect on the quality and execution of a product from start to finish.”

It’s almost like Chris has written those words for our team. I don’t have anything else to add.

Final words

Good looks are a part of the very DNA of FusionCharts. Every time a new member joins us, we tell them on the very first day – Everything coming out you has to look wow. Every chart, every product, every website, every brochure….heck even every email you send. Make it look good is the don’t be evil for us, except that we will never drop it.

[Guest author: Sanket also writes for the FusionCharts blog talking about usability, charting tips & tricks and mostly about all the behind-the-scenes fun. He loves his food and beer. Follow Sanket on Twitter:@sanketnadhani. ]

[PS: If you want to be a part of this selective list, do connect with us.]


Link to full article

Re-Introducing StartupQnA, The Awesome Place to Carry Conversations On Startups

We launched StartupQnA, a few months back and sort of tested the market to gauge if there is a serious interest from people to help others by answering their questions. Most importantly, is there a need for a such a niche vertical that caters towards startups and entrepreneurship related queries.

The experiment was a great success and today, am glad to announce the latest version of StartupQnA, which is a lot more awesome and interactive.startupqna

  • You can now follow questions and receive updates, as they are answered/follow-up questions are added.
  • You can now follow users and receive activity updates.
  • Popular Topics that you can follow and receive updates.topics_startupqna
  • You can login via Google, LinkedIn, Yahoo, Facebook or Twitter account.
  • Well, did we say Quora? Well, no. But a much needed platform for Indian technology ecosystem (in partnership with Qotd team).

So go ahead and give the new StartupQnA.com a spin – you will love it. Go ahead and ask queries about startups, entrepreneurship, technology and create industry specific themes, if you want to.


Link to full article

Fear of Location Based Services & Tracking [Mobile User Privacy]

[Editorial Notes: Recently, we shared a report on LBS industry and Mobile User Privacy, which raised an important concern regarding how mobile OS companies store location data and the privacy threat associated with it. Arjun Ram, founder of Taazza, a LBS app startup shares his take on this issue.]

We felt the need to write this post after the well advertised fiasco for iPhone and the mis-information that is being spread about LBS. Our app is a LBS app and we take privacy very seriously. Some of the questions that are lingering in the end users mind today:

So did Apple screw up? Should users be worried about LBS?

The answer lies some where in between a YES and NO. Bear with us for a second. Before we explain what happened with Apple we need to get into how location can be detected on a device – be it a phone or a computer. There are 3 ways in which this can be done:

  1. Using GPS – as in satellites. Most smart phones these days are shipped with these chips. Device has to get a lock on the satellite(s) for it to get the exact location. This usually takes time sometimes upto a minute. Depends on the quality of the device & where you are. In some of the lower end Android phones the quality of the chips isn’t great and hence takes even more time. GPS is freely available thanks to the US satellite system. GPS -> HIGHER ACCURACY (Few feet to meters), LONGER TIME
  2. Using Cell Towers – Many companies maintain a database of cell towers (ids) and their GPS co-ordinates. This information is mostly available to the mobile operators & few other companies. When your cell phone connects to the cell phone towers, it knows the IDs. Using these IDs and the GPS co-ordinates of the cell towers it is possible to triangulate your approximate location. This is generally faster if you have the cell IDs & co-ordinates of the cell towers. Cell tower information: Mobile service providers & others like Skyhook. Cell Towers -> MEDIUM ACCURACY, MEDIUM TIME
  3. Using Wifi Access Points / IP address – Based on your IP address from which the request originates, the location can be coarsely figured out. Google database is by far the most comprehensive as far as we know – tracking you down to the locality. Wifi / IP Address: LOWER ACCURACY, MEDIUM TIME

For any location based service to work – the service provider will need the location from the user. The accuracy will depend on the services being provided. As the provider of the operating system on these mobile devices, it is important for companies like Apple, Google & Microsoft to have good databases. Google even tried to buy Skyhook. The most common technique is to crowd source this data – aka cell phone towers ids & IP addresses. Moreover to optimize the response time when using GPS the operating system returns the last location that it had cached.

Google & Apple have different ways of communicating this to the user. In the case of Google, they ask you for your explicit permission when you choose the option use Wifi to locate. They also store your location data as in lat/longs for a limited period and is encrypted.

However Apple didn’t explicitly ask for such permission to save this data. Although Apple only stores approximate cell tower lat/longs – it also stores this data in an unencrypted format for a longer period. This has been confirmed to be a bug. In both cases of Google & Apple – neither of them have used this data to profile or provide this data to unauthorized folks including advertisers. (TOM TOM did so in breach of user trust but that’s a separate matter)

In Apple’s case given that the user is paying for data transfer for crowd sourcing, they should have sought explicit permission. No user wants to be paying for crowd sourcing a vendor’s data without explicit permissions.

Lets also look at the unencrypted file issue. Till this bug was discovered there was no way for anyone without the computer on which iPhone was synced to access the file. The program that was released reads the file from the backup. To say that this file was available to anyone who has access to the phone is BALONY!

Apple’s only mistake was not getting explicit permission from the end user for crowd sourcing cell id data on the end users dime.

Now lets look at this issue from an application perspective:

When you download any app from the app store/marketplace – you as a user are explicitly asked to authorize the list of permissions you are giving the app. Mostly users say yes without reading the details.

This is where Apple & Google are different.

On Android as long as the application provider asks for permission & the end users agree – the application has the authority to do anything with that data. Application provider can genuinely make a mistake (one line of code). We made a similar mistake before an end user notified us (This has been addressed a while back). But there are other applications that use your data without reason (more later).

Apple has taken the right approach on location permissions. The application provider has to explicitly state why location is needed by the application and has stated clearly that applications cannot use location for the sole purpose of advertising! Moreover at any time, the user can go into the settings window and look at applications that currently have permission to read location data and which apps are utilizing it.

In the Indian marketplace on Android, applications explicitly use the location data for the sole purpose of advertising and get away with it. We aren’t taking names at this point but are happy to do so if you ask in private.

What’s your opinion?

[Reproduced from Taazaa’s blog]


Link to full article

10 Big Businesses That Started in a Garage

Every big business had to start out somewhere, right? Some have come from more humble beginnings than others, launching with no more than some basic equipment, a couple employees, a garage space and a big idea. Whether you’re a business or finance student hoping to follow your own path to entrepreneurial success or already working in your own garage on the next big thing, these stories of companies that rose from obscurity to be multi-million (or billion) dollar industries can be a big inspiration. They may very well help you finally realize your dream of getting out of that garage and onto bigger and better things.

  1. Apple: Today, consumers will wait in line for hours just to get their hands on some of Apple’s latest products, but once upon a time this electronics giant was a mere blip on the technology industry’s radar. Back in 1976, Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniack and Ronald Wayne started a business out of a garage in Cupertino, CA, putting together one of the first prototypes of their personal computers. Over the next decades, the company would introduce several more models, including their Macintosh line in 1984, arguably what turned them from a struggling startup into a fully fledged business. Today, the company manufactures much more than computers, has almost 50,000 employees and brings in revenues of over 14 billion each year.
  2. Google: Google might be a household name today, but back in 1998 the search engine giant was just starting out. Their corporate headquarters? A Menlo Park, CA garage. For the next five months, Google’s staff of three would work out of this garage, perfecting their search algorithm, indexing web pages, and raiding the refrigerator of their friend’s attached home. By the next year the company had outgrown the garage and eventually moved into what is today known as the Googleplex. To celebrate their 8th birthday, Google purchased the garage and intends to preserve it as a lasting legacy to the humble beginnings of their business.
  3. Mattel: Mattel wasn’t always the toy maker we know it as today. When the Handler’s got their start in the 1940’s in a Southern California garage, they were making picture frames, not toys. Ruth Handler began taking the scraps of wood from those frames and making doll furniture, a side business which proved quite successful. Because of this, the entrepreneurs decided to change their focus to toys instead. In 1959, they introduced the first Barbie, and afterwards became a household name. Today they’re home to big names in the toy business like Fisher Price, Hot Wheels, garageAmerican Girl and a number of board games.
  4. HP: Back in 1939, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard decided to establish their own electronics manufacturing company. Based out their garage in Palo Alto, CA, with an initial investment of only $538, the two helped establish the technology hub that would become Silicon Valley. When they started out, they made everything from high-tech electronics to agricultural products but by the 60’s were homing in on the tech market exclusively. Today, the company is an electronics giant, with some of the highest quality personal computing products on the market. They have opted to preserve the garage where they got their start, making it into a museum.
  5. Amazon: In 1994, Jeff Bezos laid the foundations for what would be the online retailing giant Amazon in his garage, hoping to follow in the footsteps of fellow garage entrepreneurs HP. With a strong foundation, the company grew very quickly, and before long was in need of a much bigger space to house their operations. Today, there are few people who haven’t shopped with the online retailer, buying everything from food to televisions to electronic media. This small business had become one of the leading retailers in the world, with billions of dollars in sales each year.
  6. Disney: While he would go on to build an animation and entertainment empire, Walt Disney’s first studio was a tiny, one car garage in Hollywood. There he worked on a variety of animation products, setting up a makeshift studio in the space, while he waited to see if his Alice in Wonderland pilot would be picked up by any major distributors. It was, and the company quickly moved out of the garage into a proper studio. These days, Disney is an entertainment giant for kids and adults alike with movies, theme parks and products around the world. That tiny garage was almost torn down, but the dedication of a few interested citizens helped to save it and interested visitors can go there today to see where it all began.
  7. Microsoft: In 1975, Bill Gates and Paul Allen founded Microsoft, with just a few resources and an available garage space. Unlike Apple who developed both software and hardware, Microsoft homed in on the software market. Working with IBM, the company licensed their first OS for a mere $80,000. Later, they would go on to develop more sophisticated operating systems that would evolve into those we know as Windows today. The business would grow to be one of the most profitable and powerful in the world, dominating the personal computing market.
  8. MagLite: Anthony Maglica started his dream of owning a business by working long hours to earn the money it would take to put a down payment on his first lathe. Working in a Los Angeles garage, he began to design and build precision parts for industry, aerospace and the military. By 1974, he was incorporated as Mag Instrument and the company was gaining a reputation for the quality of their products. In 1979, MagLite released their first flashlight, the product they are best known for today. It would help them to become a household name and secure their place in the market.
  9. Yankee Candle Company: Unable to afford a present for his mother, young Michael Kittredge created his first scented candle from some melted crayons in his garage. Neighbors saw the candles and began purchasing them from him, eventually motivating the high school student to found a business with two high school friends. Kittredge sold the company in 1999 after a cancer scare, but it has gone on to even greater success and is now sold at many major retailers and a number of its own standalone stores.
  10. Harley Davidson: It makes complete sense that a company selling vehicles would get its start in a garage or outbuilding, because that’s where those products eventually end up. Harley Davidson did just that, starting out in 1901 with a small business that built engines for bicycles. Of course, it wasn’t long before they started developing the motorcycles for which they are known, and in 1903 they had already released their first racing bike, constructed in a small wooden shed. Buoyed by the popularity and speed of their motorcycles, the company expands, constantly rethinking the best ways to build a bike. Today, they’re still known for producing some of the biggest, best motorcycles on the market and have become a household name.

[Guest article contributed by Liz Nutt/Reproduced from author’s blog]


Link to full article