Friday, April 20, 2012

The Best and the Brightest

In The Best and the Brightest, David Halberstam’s classic book on how the United States got itself into the quagmire in Vietnam, he identified several reasons for why a superpower would fall to what President Lyndon Johnson called a “raggedy-ass little fourth-rate country”, and why brilliant men like Johnson himself as well as his subordinates such as Robert McNamara and McGeorge Bundy were unable to foresee and forestall a tragedy of Greek proportion.

Though written forty years ago, the lessons drawn by Halberstam from the debacle still ring true today. The best and the brightest still fails, and such is the case with Gaopeng.com.

A joint venture between Groupon and Tencent, Gaopeng had the best of both worlds from the get-go. Groupon’s American can-do spirit and experience combined with Tencent’s local knowledge seemed to be a winning combination. However, armed with a tremoundous amount of resource (100 million dollars), Gaopeng stumbled from be beginning. Blind expansion into dozens of cities required the company to hire quickly, resulting in a bloated 3000 men staff.

High operational cost and fierce competition meant the company bled money, which wasn’t ameliorated even as the company beat a fast retreat by closing operations and cutting staff. Further scandals such as the selling of counterfeit watches and handling employee relations callously (the company famously fired people right before they took off for the Chinese New Year holiday) made the company not viable. As rumor has it, Tencent is planning on merging Gaopeng’s operation with FTuan, another Tencent brand, and Gaopeng’s operation will eventually be winded down and folded, its staff purged.

What resulted in Gaopeng’s quick demise? To go back to Halberstam’s book, we can see that missteps of the U.S. in the 60s and Gaopeng are extremely similar. They both failed because:

1) False belief of invincibility and omnipotence

The U.S. never thought it could lose to Ho Chi Minh, so there was never any consideration for Ho’s strength or how North Vietnam would respond to American moves. On various occasions, Americans believed that by simply waltzing into Saigon, it could put the fear of God into Hanoi and force it to surrender. That never happened, and many of America’s moves look miscalculated and simply foolish.

Gaopeng also thought its genes impeccable, and thought it could dominate the market simply by walking through the door, even though Chinese Groupons had gotten head starts and have shown to be extremely tough competitors. This explains why Gaopeng was expanding so furiously: they thought the mere presence of a company with such pedigree will sweep away the Chinese companies. Of course, this didn’t happen, and like the Americans in Vietnam, Gaopeng was caught off guard and didn’t have a backup plan.

2) Lack of respect for the nuance of history

If Americans had any respect for the “arch of history”, they would have long ago realized that pumping up South Vietnam was a lost cause. Anti-colonialism was in full rage, and “white men” could no longer dictate terms. The French learned the hard lesson by fighting hard and losing big in Vietnam; Charles De Gaulle himself warned the Americans that fighting Hanoi was futile. Unfortunately, the warnings were ignored.

Gaopeng, too, should have realized that foreign Internet companies have a notoriously bad track record in China. Yahoo, Ebay, and Google are some of the well known cases where foreigners lost out to their more tenacious and well adapted local competitors. With that in mind, shouldn’t Gaopeng have substituted its extreme confidence for caution? After all, Groupon is a foreign company, and the employees they deployed to run the show at Gaopeng are also foreign. Why would they succeed where others have failed? This question was never asked.

3) Failure to recognize that people do things differently in a foreign country.

Vietnam is a unique place, with a unique history and unique culture. This obvious fact was ignored by the best and brightest of Americans; they all wanted things in Vietnam to work exactly like they do at home. By ignoring local logic, these most rational and intelligent men built extremely beautiful edifices based on the foundation of false assumptions and it all crashed down because of that.

China, too, has its unique logic. Because of differences in political and economical environment, the Chinese simply do things differently than Americans. Gaopeng didn’t appreciate many of the subtleties, and it was simply devoured by the beast of the jungle. In hindsight, it never stood a chance. If other foreign companies do not appreciate that, they too shall suffer ignominious defeats.

 

Related posts:

  1. Alibaba Spins off Group Buying Platform with Big Ambition
  2. Meituan Snags up Former Alibaba VP as COO
  3. Meituan Came in First in October with Sales Over $27M


Link to full article

Mobile Monday: Experiencing Mobile Reading, April 23rd

 

The whole publishing industry has been strongly affected by smart devices and new content distribution channels with them. More and more people are turning to smart devices as their major means of reading and getting information. Books count as a major app category in Apple AppStore; and the iPhone/iPad Newsstand opened a door for “new age” publishers and traditional media to compete directly on the same stage.

Yet we are still at the very beginning of a new age of publishing. Smart devices open a whole world of new possibilities to improve people’s reading experience. And we are far away from mastering them as we did with the traditional paper-based publishing means.

The coming MoMo invites pioneers of the mobile publishing industry. They have different backgrounds from art, culture and traditional publishing areas, and finally found themselves together facing these new challenges and opportunities. Let’s hear their story, their life experiences, and their vision about the future of mobile reading.

Schedule

19:00 – Doors Open
19:30 – 21:30 – Panel Discussion
21:30 – 22:30 – Networking & Buffet

Cost: 100RMB

Register: here

Related posts:

  1. Five Startups Presented at TechNode TNT (Beijing) Demo Time
  2. Meet deCarta and TechNode at Shanghai, Beijing, Xian, Wuhan and Guangzhou in October
  3. China Entrepreneurs – Hot Sectors for 2012, January 17th Beijing


Link to full article

24% of Web Content is Now in Chinese, Will Soon Surpass English [Infographic]

The Infographic of the Day series visually expresses important stories from Asia and the world of technology.

A new infographic shows that Chinese will soon overtake English as the dominant language online. At the end of 2011, 27 percent of web content was in English, while 24 percent was in Chinese. Despite that, the graphic’s creators, the digital agency Smartling, lament that the web is still not bilingual enough, with “56 percent of online content [being] English-only.” It calls for a more multilingual approach to the web.

We’ve taken the liberty of using some of the main images from the infographic and put them below, but you really want to check out the full thing in all its interactive and multilingual glory on the Smartling site.

First up, here’s how the web stands in Asia right now, with this region accounting for 45 percent of all the world’s web users, even though only 26 percent of the 3.5 billion people based in Asia are yet online. That’s room for some amazing growth:



The three-layer pie chart below shows the spread of languages on the web in 2000, 2005, and then 2011. In the past decade, English has shrunk from being 39 percent of all internet content down to just 27 percent at the end of 2011. It is still the lingua franca (boy, that must annoy the French) online but now by a tiny margin: it leads over Chinese – badged as ZH, which is short for Zhong wen – by just 3 percent:


Clearly, Chinese is going to overtake English as the web’s number one language very soon. At its current rate of growth, that could well happen by mid-2014. Its growth has been stellar in the past 11 years, when most other languages have been static – that’s obviously because so few of its populace was online before. Today it’s still a fairly long way from its saturation point.

Other languages are getting proportionally squeezed, such as the drop in the global share of Japanese, which is now at 8 percent and has been static since 2005. But, last year when we looked at languages used on global social media such as Twitter, we noticed the greater prevalence of Japanese, Korean, and Bahasa Indonesia.

[Source: Smartling]


Link to full article

Google+ Targets Emerging Markets with SMS Functionality

google-plus-sms

There’s good news for Google+ users around the world today, particularly for those in emerging mobile markets. Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) is rolling out its SMS notification feature in 41 countries today, which means more people can access the network regardless of the kind of mobile device they’re using. Last year when Google+ launched, SMS features were only available to users in the US and India.

Users can post updates, receive notifications, and send replies to Google+ via SMS. Including service to all carriers in the US, its good news for a number of emerging markets in Asia, particularly in Indonesia. Google+ users can get SMS functions if they are on Axis, Hutchison, Indosat, Telkomsel, and XL Axiata. A full list of countries where the service is available and associated carriers is here, if you’d like to check.

The project comes a team of engineers from Google research and development in India. Speaking to Business Standard, the company’s country head, Lalitesh Katragadda, commented on what it means for India specifically:

[Th]ere are about 120 million people who are using internet in India today whereas the number of cell phone users is more than 600 million. We want to expand the reach to the 600 million mobile phone users many of who may not have access to internet.

For more information on the service, which can be activated here, check out the Google India blog post about the feature that was posted today.

notification

gplus-1


Link to full article

Brand Survey Shows Economic Diversity in Asia, Affinity for Apple, Nokia

Sony Xperia Play

Sony was perhaps the most consistent brand, ranking in the top ten in most regions

Japan’s Nikkei BP Consulting has released the result of an interesting Asia-wide brand survey today. Its “Brand Asia 2012″ rankings span many industries, but has a number of insights into key trends surrounding the movers and shakers in tech in the region.

The survey focused on 60 global brands, as well as 40 regional for seven of the eight countries (regional brands for China, for whatever reason, were not included) [1].

Given the recent woes of Nokia (HEL:NOK1V; NYSE:NOK), it may come as a surprise to many that the company ranked atop the brand rankings for India, Indonesia, and Vietnam, and second in Thailand. This was observed last year as well, and expect Nokia to continue to hold significant mindshare in emerging markets as it tries to win over ‘the next billion.’ But in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, Nokia did not appear in the top ten.

It’s interesting to contrast this with Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), which was the standout in more mature markets, ranking as the top brand in China [2], Japan, and Taiwan, and ranking second in South Korea. Compare that to India, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand, where Apple didn’t crack the top ten.

We’ve talked about the diversity of Asia before, and certainly these result seem to indicate a sort of economic dichotomy. Surprisingly, it was only Sony (NYSE:SNE) that was consistent across all regions, as it was the brand that was ranked in the top ten in the most regions, seven of the eight. According to the report, “Although the company continues to be a source of downbeat news… in Asia Sony has a global brand asset to be proud of.”

As much as we talk about market share for these players, particularly in the mobile space, studies like this are certainly an interesting reminder of how the general population sees these brands. The rankings are below, but I encourage you to check out the full report for even more details.


  1. The full methodology can be found on the on the Nikkei BP Consulting report page. The sample sizes for each country ranged from 800 to 2400 people depending on the country.  ↩

  2. For China, this means the top global brand, as local brands were not included.  ↩


Link to full article

Rakuten to Close its China E-commerce Venture with Baidu

Rakuten-Baidu-Lekutian

Rakuten (JSD:4755) announced on its website today (pdf release) that the company would be closing the ‘Lekutian’ e-commerce venture that it had in partnership with Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) in China. Currently visiting the site at its domain Rakuten.cn, one is greeted with a message stating:

We at Lekutian hereby reluctantly inform you of the following important change. After the careful consideration of the management team, Lekutian will stop service as of April 27.

While expressing apologies and thanks to customers who have supported it so far, the company also notes that Lekutian points not redeemed/converted before the 27th will no longer be valid as of that date. So customers only have six days to use their points, because after midnight on the 26th, they’re worthless.

Rakuten also invites Chinese customers to visit its Global Market, which is, in fact, available in Chinese. As for the soon-to-be-closed Lekutian, it provides the following explanation of the closure in its announcement on its investor relations page:

[I]n the face of intensified competition in the Chinese e-commerce industry, Lekutian did not perform in line with our expectations. Following careful deliberation, both Rakuten and Baidu determined that closing Lekutian was in the best interest of all stakeholders.

The company adds that this will not have a sigificant impact on its finances, as the investment into the venture was less that it had originally planned. The Chinese press was had been reporting trouble with the Rakuten-Baidu joint venture earlier in the month. And as we see today, the Lekutian venture just didn’t work out.

Despite this setback, Rakuten has been expanding from its home base of Japan with a number or partnerships and acquisitions around the world. Rakuten will “continue to evaluate” opportunities in China, and it will be interesting to see how its next venture into China’s fiercely competitive e-commerce space goes, if it goes at all.


Link to full article

Rakuten To Dissolve Lekutian In China, Joint-Mall With Baidu

Japan’s largest e-mall company Rakuten today announced [J] that they would shut down its Chinese e-mall Lekutian(rakuten.cn) planned in May, 2012.

Rakuten jointly established Lekutian with China’s search engine giant Baidu in January 2010, and began the mall in October 2010.

The reason is explained as Lekutian did not show the growth they had expected, which is because the environment of e-commerce in China has been becoming too competitive.



Rakuten To Dissolve Lekutian In China, Joint-Mall With Baidu


Link to full article

Friday Hacks on the Unix Philosophy

This post is a first hand account from NUS Hackers on their weekly Friday Hacks, an IDA supported event to promote student developers throughout the tech startup community.

On the 30th of March 2012, Dr. Michael Brown came down to our weekly Friday Hacks session to talk to us about the Unix Philosophy. As per normal, pizza was served at 6pm and the talk started at 7pm.

Most people know Unix as an operating system – albeit one that is powerful and still much in use today (in systems as varied as Apple’s OSX and the various Linux distributions on the market today). Dr. Brown focused specifically on the history leading up to the development of Unix as well as some of the underlying principles and practices that make up the Unix Philosophy.

Amongst those ideas included the rule of modularity, the rule of clarity and the rule of composition.

Dr. Brown is an Associate Professor and Assistant Dean (External Relations) in the School of Computing at the National University of Singapore. He also regularly serves on the program committees for the major Computer Vision conferences (ICCV, CVPR, ECCV and ACCV) and is currently an Associate Editor for IEEE TPAMI.

About 35 people attended this Friday Hacks session. After Dr. Brown’s talk, we had a short, informal presentation by NUS Hackers member Divyanshu Arora on the various Linux distributions to try out.

This was an IDA supported event, and all food and beverages were provided for with their kind support. We also wrote a post urging our members to try out, install and hack on the Linux distributions Div had talked about, here.


Link to full article

Friday Hacks on the Unix Philosophy

This post is a first hand account from NUS Hackers on their weekly Friday Hacks, an IDA supported event to promote student developers throughout the tech startup community.

On the 30th of March 2012, Dr. Michael Brown came down to our weekly Friday Hacks session to talk to us about the Unix Philosophy. As per normal, pizza was served at 6pm and the talk started at 7pm.

Most people know Unix as an operating system – albeit one that is powerful and still much in use today (in systems as varied as Apple’s OSX and the various Linux distributions on the market today). Dr. Brown focused specifically on the history leading up to the development of Unix as well as some of the underlying principles and practices that make up the Unix Philosophy.

Amongst those ideas included the rule of modularity, the rule of clarity and the rule of composition.

Dr. Brown is an Associate Professor and Assistant Dean (External Relations) in the School of Computing at the National University of Singapore. He also regularly serves on the program committees for the major Computer Vision conferences (ICCV, CVPR, ECCV and ACCV) and is currently an Associate Editor for IEEE TPAMI.

About 35 people attended this Friday Hacks session. After Dr. Brown’s talk, we had a short, informal presentation by NUS Hackers member Divyanshu Arora on the various Linux distributions to try out.

This was an IDA supported event, and all food and beverages were provided for with their kind support. We also wrote a post urging our members to try out, install and hack on the Linux distributions Div had talked about, here.


Link to full article

Understanding Director Identification Number (DIN) for companies in India [Whiteboard Friday]

Director Identification Number (DIN) is a unique identification number for an existing director or a person intending to become the director of a company.

In this episode of “Whiteboard Friday”, the eLagaan team explains concept behind DIN number, why it is needed, who is for & other common queries related to DIN, required by directors before starting a company in India.

More@ Pluggd.in/TV  | Legal Resources for Startups


Link to full article